Open Access vs. Intellectual Property Rights
Friday, June 26th, 2009Peter Eckersley at the New Scientist has posted a very interesting discussion on the intellectual property / open access debate. In a 24 June 2009 article, “Finding a fair price for free knowledge,” he acknowledges the conflict between advocates of scarcity and the advocates of abundance, and takes a balanced look at each side.
Finally, he suggests that “when we build institutions to promote the abundance of knowledge, everybody wins. When it comes to knowledge, you can never have too much of a good thing.”
This is a debate that freelance writers and editors need to follow. As producers of content and processors of knowledge, we are deeply impacted by intellectual property rights issues and the open access debate. While knowledge must be shared, there must be adequate financial incentives for those who process it and prepare it for general consumption. Although I would continue to write even if I couldn’t earn a living at it, I’d have less time to do it, as I’d have to earn a living another way. I believe this is true of most freelance writers, and fewer writers working fewer hours would ultimately result in less knowledge disseminated.
As Eckersley suggests, open access is here to stay, and that’s not a bad thing. I believe that if you follow this issue, you can be prepared for any changes that come, and ready to continue profiting from the work you love. What do you think?

